In statuam Amoris.

A statue of love

Quis sit Amor plures olim cecinere Poëtae,
Eius qui vario nomine gesta ferunt.
Convenit hoc, quòd veste caret, quòd corpore parvus,
Tela alasque ferens, lumina nulla tenet.
Haec ora, hic habitusque Dei est: sed dicere tantos
Si licet in vates, falsa subesse reor.
Eccur nudus agat? Divo quasi pallia desint,
Qui cunctas domiti possidet orbis opes.
Aut quî quaeso nives Boreamque evadere nudus
Alpinum potuit, strictaque prata gelu?[1]
Si puer est, puerumve vocas qui Nestora[2] vincit?
An nosti Ascraei carmina docta senis?[3]
Inconstans puer, hic pervicax, pectora quae iam
Trans adiit, nunquam linquere sponte potest.
At pharetras & tela gerit, quid inutile pondus?
  Link to an image of this page  [k8r p159]An curvare infans cornua dura valet?
Alas curve tenet, quas nescit in aethera ferre?
Inscius in volucrum flectere tela iecur.[4]
Serpit humi, semperque virûm mortalia corda
Laedit,[5] & haud alas saxeus inde movet.
Si caecus vitamque gerit, quid taenia caeco
Utilis est? ideo num minus ille videt?
Quisne sagittiferum credat, qui lumine captus?
Hic certa, ast caeci spicula vana movet.
Igneus est aiunt, versatque in pectore flammas:
Cur agè vivit adhuc? omnia flamma vorat.
Quin etiam tumidis cur non extinguitur undis,
Naiadum quoties mollia corda subit?[6]
At tu ne tantis capiare erroribis audi,
Verus quid sit Amor, carmina nostra ferent.
Iucundus labor est, lasciva per ocia, signum
Illius est, nigro punica glans[7] clypeo.

Many poets in the past have told us who Love is, recording his deeds under many a name. This they agree on - he has no clothes and is small in stature, carries arrows, wears wings, but has no eyes. This is the appearance, the bearing of the god . But if one may contradict such mighty bards, there is falsehood lurking here, I think. Why ever should he be naked? As if garments would be lacking for a god who possesses all the resources of a conquered world. Or how could he, if naked, survive the snows and North wind blowing from the Alps, the fields stiff with frost? - If he is a boy, do you call a boy one who is older than Nestor? Maybe you know the learned poem of the old man of Ascra? A child is changeable, but he is stubborn - the hearts he has once pierced he can never leave of his own volition. He bears quivers and arrows - why this useless burden? Has an infant strength to flex the stiff bow? - Or why does he have wings, when he does not know how to take to the air with them? He has no skill to direct his arrows at the liver of birds, but steals along the ground and always hurts the mortal hearts of men. Hard as stone, he never stirs his wings from there. - If he is blind and also wears a bandage, what does a blindfold do for a blind person? Surely he doesn’t see any less because of it? Or who would believe that anyone carries arrows when he is deprived of sight Love shoots straight, the blind shoot arrows at a venture. - He is fiery, they say, and has flames leaping in his breast. Then why is he still in existence? Flame consumes everything. Indeed, why is he not quenched by the swelling waves whenever he steals into the tender hearts of the Water Nymphs? In order not to be deceived by such great errors, do you listen and our poem will tell what Love truly is. It is a work of delight, the frivolous occupation of leisure hours. Its sign is a Punic fruit on a black shield.